Today in one of my English classes the professor said that he wanted to - with our permission - do something different during the first part of our lecture time and get to the nineteenth-century literature later on. He wished to discuss the events at Dawson College this week because he believe it is something that we
need to discuss or
should discuss. (I am inclined to agree with him though I'm not sure about how absolute the idea is.) The class responded well and a 50+ minute discussion ensued. Some feedback I had already heard in response to similar events, some feedback was innovative some was difficult to understand but, very surprizingly, none of it seemed put on. When the professor first presented his idea, I was worried people would still consider the talk to be part of their academic performance and basically try to impress but they didn't. People are getting mature and when I say, "people", I'm referring to my peers; the ones I will always see when I look left and right. One girl in my class works for the CSA (Central Students' Association) and she told us that when she first heard the news on Wednesday, she, "rushed to the fourth floor and asked if the flag could be lowered to half-mast." The response she got was no and the reasoning was that the U of G couldn't do it alone; the act needs to be performed in tandem with other universities.
My question is: what the deal? This brings me to the meat of the post.
But first, a little more background...
One question that surfaced two or three times during the talk but remained unanswered was that which inquired as to our response. What should our reaction be? Later it became, why is our reaction to this event different from what is going on in Afghanistan, Iraq, Haiti, etc.? How do we get to decide what is worth caring about, what is worth time on/in the news and what does that say about how we value people outside of Canada? I have often wondered about this idea and found myself angered at how an anchorperson could tell me that Flight 231 to Tokyo went down and 54 passengers, including 4 Canadians were killed and I would be expected to accept this as reasonable reporting. I don't get it, I honestly don't. No life is worth more than another. But then I got to thinking about it real deep-like and concluded that our relations as one country to the others, the relationship between the groups of people we DO know and those that we do not, the relationship between our family and our friends and even the relationship between our mother and our second cousin are all the same: I can value both parties equally, as human beings but my grief for one will be different than for the other.
Call it crass if you must, but I believe that we
cannot care for any given person in the world as much as we care for our son, our wife or our best friend. If we could, what would set any one relationship apart? Is it not better to have special people in your life instead of having uniform relationships with all?
With that in mind, my status is as follows:
When considering "how to react" or whether or not to lower your flag, strip the situation down to its most basic form: Someone died. You care about that. Now, how much you cry, what actions you take and what you say about that will depend on who you are. But before that, before politics come into play, you know that it is a sad thing and maybe even a tragedy for a human being (someone
just like you) to pass away and you can react to only that. I don't feel obligated to react
as a university student because this incident took place at an educational institution. I didn't/wouldn't/don't feel obligated to react
as a woman to the "Montreal Massacre" (if that's what it's called). I react as a person who can mourn the loss of a person.
If you feel a particular tie then that aint wrong. If your bubble was burst and the that-would-never-happen-to-me/-in-my-neighbourhood monster came in and gave you a fright then react to that. As for me, I refuse to feel more poorly about one thing because the media and the people in my world blow it up in my face and try to solicit tears.